OPT Students Without Employer Information in SEVIS are auto-terminating
As reported in September 2020, the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) is conducting a review of SEVIS records for optional practical training (OPT) participants and is mailing notices directly to students who have not reported employer information and have exceeded 90 days of unemployment.
If the student’s SEVIS record is not updated, SEVP will “terminate” the student’s SEVIS record to reflect the lack of employer information and that the student may have violated their status either by failing to timely report OPT employment or by exceeding the permissible period of unemployment while on OPT.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to eliminate “duration of status” D/S for F and J visa holders
On September 25, 2020, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed a rule to eliminate duration of status (D/S) for F students and their dependents as well as for J exchange visitors and their dependents. Below is a listing of key proposed changes:
Eliminating D/S. Instead of being admitted for "duration of status" (D/S) as they currently are, individuals applying for admission in either F or J status (F-1 students, F-2 dependents, J-1 exchange visitors, and J-2 dependents) would be admitted for the length of time indicated by the program end date noted in their Form I-20 or DS-2019, not to exceed four years, unless they are subject to a more limited 2-year admission, plus a period of 30 days following their program end date. The proposed revisions to the J regulations closely align with the proposed changes for F nonimmigrants.
Groups subject to a limited 2-year admission instead of a 4-year admission. " DHS believes a shorter admission period, up to 2 years, would be appropriate for a subset of the F and J population due to heightened concerns related to fraud, abuse, and national security, as discussed below."
Notably, School or exchange program not participating in E-Verify. Only a two year admission period for students at schools and exchange visitor programs who do not fully participate in E-Verify. In the preamble, DHS rationalizes that schools and exchange visitor programs "that are willing to go above and beyond to ensure compliance with immigration law in one respect are more likely to comply with immigration law in other respects," and that it has "less confidence" in schools and exchange programs "that are unwilling to do all they can to ensure they have a legal workforce." The proposed regulatory wording then makes clear that a school or program that is only partially enrolled in E-Verify (e.g., a single hiring center or department) would not be sufficient to avoid the two year admission limit for its students or exchange visitors, by requiring the school or program to be "a participant in good standing in E-Verify as determined by USCIS," which is then defined as: "Enrolled in E-Verify with respect to all hiring sites in the United States" at the time of the individual's admission in F-1 or J-1 status or at the time the individual files an application for an extension of or change to F-1 or J-1 status with USCIS, and "are in compliance with all requirements of the E-Verify program, including but not limited to verifying the employment eligibility of newly hired employees in the United States; and continue to be participants in good standing in E-Verify at any time during which the alien is pursuing a full-course of study at the educational institution" or "the J-1 exchange visitor is participating in an exchange visitor program at the organization."
Reducing the F-1 "grace period" from 60 days to 30 days. "DHS believes that the F category, albeit distinct from M or J, shares a core similarity in that many aliens in these categories are seeking admission to the United States to study at United States educational institutions. Thus, DHS thinks that these categories should have a standard period of time to prepare for departure, or take other actions to extend, change, or otherwise maintain lawful status."
Limit on aggregate ESL study. F-1 students in a language training program would be restricted to a lifetime aggregate of 24 months of language study, which would include breaks and an annual vacation.
Limit on pursuing new F-1 programs at the same educational level. "DHS thus proposes to limit the number of times a student can change to another program within an educational level, such as to pursue another bachelor's or master's degree. Specifically, any student who has completed a program at one educational level would be allowed to change to another program at the same educational level no more than two additional times while in F-1 status, for a total of three programs for the lifetime of the student."
Limit on "reverse matriculation" by F-1 students. "An F-1 student who has completed a program at one educational level would be allowed to change to a lower educational level one time while in F-1 status."
F-1 cap-gap would be retained, and October 1 end date would be extended to April 1. On a positive note, DHS says: "With the consistently high volume of H-1B petitions each year, however, USCIS has been unable to complete adjudication of H-1B cap- subject petitions by October 1, resulting in situations where some individuals must stop working on October 1... To account for this operational issue, DHS is proposing... to provide an automatic extension of F-1 status and post-completion OPT, as applicable, until April 1 of the fiscal year for which the H-1B petition is filed."
I-539 as the extension of stay application form. "USCIS anticipates accepting the Form I-539, Application to Change/Extend Nonimmigrant Status, for this population but would like the flexibility to use a new form if more efficient or responsive to workload needs. Thus, DHS is proposing to use general language to account for a possible change in form in the future. If the form ever changes, USCIS would provide stakeholder’s advanced notice on its webpage and comply with Paperwork Reduction Act requirements."
Standards for DHS to approve an F-1 extension of stay. "DHS is proposing to eliminate a reference to “normal progress” with respect to seeking a program extension, and incorporate a new standard that makes it clear that acceptable reasons for requesting an extension of a stay for additional time to complete a program are: (1) compelling academic reasons; (2) a documented illness or medical condition; and (3) exceptional circumstances beyond the control of the alien."
Reinstatement. "[A] student’s failure to timely request from the DSO a recommendation for extension of the program end date, which would result in the DSO recommending an extension of the program end date in SEVIS after the end date noted on the most recent Form I-20 or successor form, would require the alien to file for a reinstatement of F-1 status, because the alien would have failed to maintain status and would be ineligible for an EOS... A request for reinstatement must be filed in the manner and on the form designated by USCIS, with the required fee, including any biometrics required by 8 CFR 103.16. DHS is also requiring F-2 dependents seeking to accompany the F-1 principal student to file applications for an EOS or reinstatement, as applicable. These requirements are consistent with current provisions."
Dependents. F-2 and J-2 dependents seeking to accompany the F-1 or J-1 principal would need to file applications for an EOS or reinstatement, as applicable. If the dependent files a separate Form I-539, he or she would need to pay a separate Form I-539 filing fee. However, if the dependent files a Form I-539A as part of the primary applicant’s EOS request on a Form I-539, only one fee would be required... To qualify for an EOS, the F-2 or J-2 dependent would need to demonstrate the qualifying relationship with the principal F-1 or J-1 principal who is maintaining status, also be maintaining his or her own status, and not have engaged in any unauthorized employment. Extensions of stay for dependents would not be able to exceed the authorized admission period of the principal.
Additional Resources from NAFSA (National Association of Foreign Service Advisors):
On Tuesday, October 13 (2pm-3pm ET), NAFSA will offer a discussion of the proposed rule. You can register for the Responding to the DHS Proposal to Eliminate Duration of Status town hall online. Space is limited, and the recording will be made available a couple of days after the session.
NAFSA's Proposal to Replace Duration of Status page reviews the proposed rule, and provides lots of further reading/ resources.
NAFSA's DHS Issues Proposed Rule to Eliminate Decades-Long Duration of Status Policy for International Students, Exchange Visitors full statement can be helpful to share with stakeholders who need to understand general impact but not detail.
For advocacy, NAFSA's Connecting our World is offering a Fight Back Against Duration of Status Change page, where requests can be sent to members of congress to speak out in support of international students. NAFSA is also preparing a template for institutions to use in preparing a comment letter -- stay tuned.
U.S. reaches agreement with Canada and Mexico to extend land border crossing restrictions due to Covid-19 pandemic
On September 18, 2020, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced an extension of measures to limit all non-essential travel across the U.S. land borders with Canada and Mexico through October 21, 2020. DHS said in a statement, “The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments are taking necessary action to fight against this pandemic together.” DHS fact sheet: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/09/18/fact-sheet-dhs-measures-border-limit-further-spread-coronavirus
Congress Authorizes DHS to expand Premium Processing Program with passage of the Emergency Stopgap USCIS Stabilization Act
As part of the most recent continuing resolution funding government operations through December 11, 2020, Congress passed the Emergency Stopgap USCIS Stabilization Act. The new law authorizes DHS to expand the premium processing program to include several new benefit types, including immigrant petitions for multi-national managers and self-sponsored national interest waivers. The Act also calls on DHS to add to the premium processing program applications to change or extend status, employment authorization, and any other immigration benefit application DHS deems appropriate. While increasing the number of application types eligible for premium processing, the law also increases the premium processing fee and processing timeframes. The law is effective immediately but requires implementation by DHS. Accordingly, it may take several weeks to months before newly designated application types are allowed to access premium processing.
October Visa Bulletin Advances
Each month, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) publishes the Visa Bulletin, listing all "preference" categories and states whether or not a backlog exists for each one. In addition, the categories are folded into two charts: “Final Action” chart and a “Filing” chart for Family-Based immigration and Employment-Based immigration.
For October 2020, USCIS has indicated that for Employment-Based immigration, the “Dates for Filing Applications” chart should be used in establishing eligibility to file the I-485 Adjustment of Status petitions. This provides significant advancement in nearly all preference categories. This means that those who filed an Immigrant Petition Form I-140 on or before the date given in the Visa Bulletin are able to file for permanent resident status [Form I-485].
While the EB-1 preference category for all countries is current, there was significant movement for China and India, advancing to September 1, 2020, meaning that those applicants whoseI-140 was filed on or before that date are able to file I-485 to apply for permanent residency.
The EB-2 preference category remains “current” for all countries other than China and India which means that individuals in these categories may immediately file I-485 applications. China and India have advanced to October 1, 2016 and May 15, 2011, respectively.
The EB-3 preference category is now “current” for all countries other than China and India which means that individuals in these categories may also immediately file I-485 applications. China and India have advanced to June 1, 2018 and January 1, 2015, respectively.
Because of the difference in dates on the two charts, I-485 applications filed now may be pending for lengthy periods of time; however, the opportunity to file the I-485 applications is available now.
If you have questions about planning, please feel free to reach out and schedule a consultation with one of the attorneys (info@iandoli.com).
Department of Homeland Security Proposed Rule on Use and Collection of Biometrics to include US Citizens
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed a rule on the use and collection of biometrics in the enforcement and administration of immigration laws. Under the new rule DHS would be authorized to collect biometrics from any individual in connection with an immigration benefit including U.S. citizens, U.S. Permanent Residents, and foreign nationals who have already been screened previously. DHS would also be able to use DNA testing, new biometrics technologies including voice, iris, and facial recognition in addition to its existing biometric practices, which include collecting fingerprints and signatures of immigrants.
While biometric technology was previously used for background checks only, the new rule suggests collection should be required for identity enrollment, verification, and management and the production of secure identity documents. The language of the rule leaves room for more purposes, broadly stating, “other functions related to administering and enforcing the immigration and naturalization laws.”
According to DHS’ estimate, the rule change would increase the population of people submitting biometric information from 3.90 million to 6.07 million. The collection rate across all types of forms would increase from 46% to over 70%.
Comments on the rule are due on 10/13/20, with comments on associated proposed form revisions due 11/10/20. Drafts of the proposed form revisions can be viewed in the docket folder for the proposed rule on the regulations.gov site. (85 FR 56338, 9/11/20)
Recent Court Decisions on the Department of Homeland Security and Department of State Public Charge Rules
On September 11, 2020, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals stayed a district court's nationwide injunction on the DHS public charge rule. This means that USCIS is now free to require the Form I-944 in all jurisdictions. On September 22, 2020, USCIS issued guidance on how it will be implementing the DHS Public Charge Rule given the Second Circuit stay.
Specifically, USCIS has announced that it will apply the Public Charge rule to all petitions and applications postmarked on or after February 24, 2020. USCIS has indicated that it will not re-adjudicate any applications or petitions already approved that were filed without required forms, information or evidence. However, for cases that are pending or are filed before October 13, 2020, USCIS may issue Requests for Evidence (RFEs) for the necessary forms or evidence. Cases filed after October 13, 2020, without the forms, information, or evidence required by the Public Charge rule will be rejected.
Planned Oct. 2 USCIS Fee Increases Enjoined by Federal District Court
On August 3, 2020, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Final Rule that significantly alters the USCIS fee schedule by adjusting fees, adding new fees, establishing multiple fees for nonimmigrant worker petitions, and limiting the number of beneficiaries for certain forms. These new fees were set to take effect on October 2, 2020. Since then, two lawsuits were filed challenging the fee hikes and related actions.
On September 29, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by eight nonprofit organizations challenging the rule.
The decision provides:
1. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. section 705 the Court STAYS implementation and the effective date of USCIS Immigration Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements, 85 Fed. Reg. 46,788 (Aug. 3, 2020) (the “Final Rule”) in its entirety pending final adjudication of this matter.
2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, Defendants Wolf, in his official capacity under the title of Acting Secretary of DHS; Cuccinelli, in his official capacity under the title of Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary of DHS; DHS; and USCIS, and all persons acting under their direction, ARE ENJOINED from implementing or enforcing the Final Rule or any portion thereof.
3. This preliminary injunction and stay shall take effect immediately and shall remain in effect pending trial in this action or further of this Court.
Until further notice, petitioners and applicants will not be subject to the higher fees or forms. It is expected that USCIS will issue an update concerning the impact of the order on the new editions of the forms that were to become mandatory on October 2, in conjunction with the fee rule.
Iandoli Desai & Cronin PC will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates when available.
USCIS Guidance on DACA
USCIS issued a memorandum providing guidance on how it will implement DHS Acting Secretary’s July 28, 2020, memo on DACA. Among other things, USCIS will reject all initial DACA requests from individuals who have never previously received DACA and return all fees; accept requests from those who had been granted DACA at any time in the past; and will also accept requests for advance parole that are properly submitted.
For approvable DACA renewal requests, USCIS will limit grants of deferred action and employment authorization under DACA to no more than one year. USCIS will generally reject requests received more than 150 days before the current grant of DACA expires. DACA recipients should file their renewal request between 150 and 120 days before their current grant of DACA expires.
New I-765 Edition
USCIS announced and implemented a new edition of the Form I-765 issued by USCIS (8/25/20 edition), which took effect on August 25, 2020.
As a reminder USCIS will not accept Applications for Employment Authorization applications postmarked after August 25, 2020 if not filed with the 8/25/20 edition of Form I-765 and I-765WS and correct fees.