ICE Issues FAQ Update for SEVP Stakeholders

In an everchanging environment adapting to COVID-19, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) updated its FAQs, adding a new section, “Clarifying Questions for Fall 2020 Based on March 9 Spring Guidance Broadcast,” another section called “Archived Questions” containing FAQs specific to the spring or summer semester (the answers to these questions are considered rescinded), and editing existing questions and answers to reflect the fall 2020 semester.

Please visit ICE’s website for the latest FAQ for SEVP Stakeholders about COVID-19.

SEVP to Mail Notices to OPT Students Without Employer Information, auto-terminations looming

The Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) is conducting a review of SEVIS records for optional practical training (OPT) participants and is mailing notices directly to students who have not reported employer information and have exceeded 90 days of unemployment.

The notice informs students of their lack of employer/employment information and provides an opportunity for them to update their records either through their designated school officials (DSOs) or directly through the SEVP Portal. If the student’s SEVIS record is not updated, SEVP will set the record to “terminated” to reflect the lack of employer information and the potential that the student may have violated their status either by failing to timely report OPT employment or by exceeding the permissible period of unemployment while on OPT.

 

USCIS Reminds F-1 students and School Officials to Update SEVIS

On August 18, 2020, USCIS reminded F-1 nonimmigrant students and their designated school officials (DSOs) that they must update the employer information in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), including unemployment data, because “exceeding unemployment limits can result in a loss of status.” USCIS said that SEVIS “will count each day without employer information toward the total number of unemployment days allowed.” Students must notify DSOs within 10 days of changes in personal or employment information, and DSOs must update SEVIS with the information within 21 days.

USCIS also said that in addition to a possible loss of status, failure to timely update employer information in SEVIS and thus exceeding unemployment limits could result in USCIS’s initiating revocation proceedings for the F-1 nonimmigrant’s employment authorization document or negatively affect the F-1 nonimmigrant’s future benefit requests filed with USCIS.

Department of State (DOS) Update to National Interest Exceptions to Presidential Proclamations

On August 12, 2020 the Department of State (DOS) updated the National Interest Exceptions to the June President proclamations. The President signed Presidential Proclamation (P.P.) 10052, which extends P.P. 10014, which suspended the entry to the United States of certain immigrant visa applicants, through December 31, 2020. P.P. 10052 also suspends the entry to the United States of certain additional foreign nationals who present a risk to the U.S. labor market during the economic recovery following the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak.  Specifically, the suspension applies to applicants for H-1B, H-2B, and L-1 visas; J-1 visa applicants participating in the intern, trainee, teacher, camp counselor, au pair, or summer work travel programs; and any spouses or children of covered applicants applying for H-4, L-2, or J-2 visas. 

The Proclamation does not apply to applicants who were in the United States on the effective date of the Proclamation (June 24), or who had a valid visa in the classifications mentioned above (and plans to enter the United States on that visa), or who had another official travel document valid on the effective date of the Proclamation. If an H-1B, H-2B, L-1, or J-1 non-immigrant is not subject to the Proclamation, then neither that individual nor the individual’s spouse or children will be prevented from obtaining a visa due to the Proclamation.  

Until complete resumption of routine visa services, applicants who appear to be subject to entry restrictions under P.P. 10014, P.P. 10052, and/or regional-focused Presidential Proclamations related to COVID-19 (P.P. 9984, 9992, 9993, 9996, and/ or 10041) might not be processed for a visa interview appointment unless the applicant is eligible for an exception under the applicable Proclamation(s).  Both P.P. 10014 and 10052 include exceptions, including an exception for individuals whose travel would be in the national interest.  Applicants who are subject to any of these Proclamations, but who believe they may qualify for a national interest exception or other exception, should follow the instructions on the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate’s website regarding procedures necessary to request an emergency appointment and should provide specific details as to why they believe they may qualify for an exception.  While a visa applicant subject to one or more Proclamations might meet an exception, the applicant must first be approved for an emergency appointment request and a final determination regarding visa eligibility will be made at the time of visa interview.  Please note that U.S. Embassies and Consulates may only be able to offer limited visa services due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in which case they may not be able to accommodate your request unless the proposed travel is deemed emergency or mission critical.  Prospective visa applicants should visit the website for Embassy or Consulate where they intend to apply for a visa to get updates on current operating status.  Travelers who are subject to a regional COVID-19 Proclamation but who do not require a visa, such as ESTA travelers (i.e., those traveling on the Visa Waiver Program), should also follow the guidance on the nearest Embassy or Consulate’s website for how to request consideration for a national interest exception.

The list below is a non-exclusive list of the types of travel that may be considered to be in the national interest

Exceptions under P.P. 10052 for certain travel in the national interest by nonimmigrants may include the following:

H-1B Applicants:

  • For travel as a public health or healthcare professional, or researcher to alleviate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, or to conduct ongoing medical research in an area with a substantial public health benefit (e.g. cancer or communicable disease research). This includes those traveling to alleviate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that may be a secondary effect of the pandemic (e.g., travel by a public health or healthcare professional, or researcher in an area of public health or healthcare that is not directly related to COVID-19, but which has been adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic).

  • Travel supported by a request from a U.S. government agency or entity to meet critical U.S. foreign policy objectives or to satisfy treaty or contractual obligations. This would include individuals, identified by the Department of Defense or another U.S. government agency, performing research, providing IT support/services, or engaging other similar projects essential to a U.S. government agency.

  • Travel by applicants seeking to resume ongoing employment in the United States in the same position with the same employer and visa classification.  Forcing employers to replace employees in this situation may cause financial hardship.  Consular officers can refer to Part II, Question 2 of the approved Form I-129 to determine if the applicant is continuing in “previously approved employment without change with the same employer.”

  • Travel by technical specialists, senior level managers, and other workers whose travel is necessary to facilitate the immediate and continued economic recovery of the United States.  Consular officers may determine that an H-1B applicant falls into this category when at least two of the following five indicators are present:

1.      The petitioning employer has a continued need for the services or labor to be performed by the H-1B nonimmigrant in the United States.  Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) approved by DOL during or after July 2020 are more likely to account for the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. labor market and the petitioner’s business; therefore, this indicator is only present for cases with an LCA approved during or after July 2020 as there is an indication that the petitioner still has a need for the H-1B worker.  For LCAs approved by DOL before July 2020, this indicator is only met if the consular officer is able to determine from the visa application the continuing need of petitioned workers with the U.S. employer.  Regardless of when the LCA was approved, if an applicant is currently performing or is able to perform the essential functions of the position for the prospective employer remotely from outside the United States, then this indicator is not present.

2.      The applicant’s proposed job duties or position within the petitioning company indicate the individual will provide significant and unique contributions to an employer meeting a critical infrastructure need.  Critical infrastructure sectors are chemical, communications, dams, defense industrial base, emergency services, energy, financial services, food and agriculture, government facilities, healthcare and public health, information technology, nuclear reactors, transportation, and water systems.  Employment in a critical infrastructure sector alone is not sufficient; the consular officers must establish that the applicant holds one of the two types of positions noted below:

a)       Senior level placement within the petitioning organization or job duties reflecting performance of functions that are both unique and vital to the management and success of the overall business enterprise; OR

b)       The applicant’s proposed job duties and specialized qualifications indicate the individual will provide significant and unique contributions to the petitioning company.

3.      The wage rate paid to the H-1B applicant meaningfully exceeds the prevailing wage rate by at least 15 percent (see Part F, Questions 10 and 11 of the LCA).  When an H-1B applicant will receive a wage that meaningfully exceeds the prevailing wage, it suggests that the employee fills an important business need where an American worker is not available.

4.      The H-1B applicant’s education, training and/or experience demonstrate unusual expertise in the specialty occupation in which the applicant will be employed.  For example, an H-1B applicant with a doctorate or professional degree, or many years of relevant work experience, may have such advanced expertise in the relevant occupation as to make it more likely that he or she will perform critically important work for the petitioning employer.

5.      Denial of the visa pursuant to P.P. 10052 will cause financial hardship to the U.S. employer.  The following examples, to be assessed based on information from the visa application, are illustrative of what may constitute a financial hardship for an employer if a visa is denied: the employer’s inability to meet financial or contractual obligations; the employer’s inability to continue its business; or a delay or other impediment to the employer’s ability to return to its pre-COVID-19 level of operations.    

J-1 Applicants

  • Travel to provide care for a minor U.S. citizen, LPR, or nonimmigrant in lawful status by an au pair possessing special skills required for a child with particular needs (e.g., medical, special education, or sign language).  Childcare services provided for a child with medical issues diagnosed by a qualified medical professional by an individual who possesses skills to care for such child will be considered to be in the national interest.

  • Travel by an au pair that prevents a U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident, or other nonimmigrant in lawful status from becoming a public health charge or ward of the state of a medical or other public funded institution.

  • Childcare services provided for a child whose parents are involved with the provision of medical care to individuals who have contracted COVID-19 or medical research at United States facilities to help the United States combat COVID-19.

  • An exchange program conducted pursuant to an MOU, Statement of Intent, or other valid agreement or arrangement between a foreign government and any federal, state, or local government entity in the United States that is designed to promote U.S. national interests if the agreement or arrangement with the foreign government was in effect prior to the effective date of the Presidential Proclamation.

  • Interns and Trainees on U.S. government agency-sponsored programs (those with a program number beginning with "G-3" on Form DS-2019): An exchange visitor participating in an exchange visitor program in which he or she will be hosted by a U.S. government agency and the program supports the immediate and continued economic recovery of the United States.

  • Specialized Teachers in Accredited Educational Institutions with a program number beginning with "G-5" on Form DS-2019: An exchange visitor participating in an exchange program in which he or she will teach full-time, including a substantial portion that is in person, in a publicly or privately operated primary or secondary accredited educational institution where the applicant demonstrates ability to make a specialized contribution to the education of students in the United States.  A “specialized teacher” applicant must demonstrate native or near-native foreign language proficiency and the ability to teach his/her assigned subject(s) in that language.

  • Critical foreign policy objectives: This only includes programs where an exchange visitor participating in an exchange program that fulfills critical and time sensitive foreign policy objectives.
     

L-1A Applicants

  • Travel as a public health or healthcare professional, or researcher to alleviate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, or to conduct ongoing medical research in an area with a substantial public health benefit.  This includes those traveling to alleviate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that may be a secondary effect of the pandemic.

  • Travel based on a request from a U.S. government agency or entity to meet critical foreign policy objectives or satisfy treaty or contractual obligations.  An example of this would be supporting U.S. military base construction or IT infrastructure.

  • Travel by applicants seeking to resume ongoing employment in the United States in the same position with the same employer and visa classification.   Forcing employers to replace employees in this situation may cause undue financial hardship. 

  • Travel by a senior level executive or manager filling a critical business need of an employer meeting a critical infrastructure need. Critical infrastructure sectors include chemical, communications, dams, defense industrial base, emergency services, energy, financial services, food and agriculture, government facilities, healthcare and public health, information technology, nuclear reactors, transportation, and water systems.  An L-1A applicant falls into this category when at least two of the following three indicators are present AND the L-1A applicant is not seeking to establish a new office in the United States:

1.      Will be a senior-level executive or manager;

2.      Has spent multiple years with the company overseas, indicating a substantial knowledge and expertise within the organization that can only be replicated by a new employee within the company following extensive training that would cause the employer financial hardship; or

3.      Will fill a critical business need for a company meeting a critical infrastructure need.

  • L-1A applicants seeking to establish a new office in the United States likely do NOT fall into this category, unless two of the three criteria are met AND the new office will employ, directly or indirectly, five or more U.S. workers.

L-1B Applicants

  • Travel as a public health or healthcare professional, or researcher to alleviate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, or to conduct ongoing medical research in an area with a substantial public health benefit. This includes those traveling to alleviate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that may be a secondary effect of the pandemic.

  • Travel based on a request from a U.S. government agency or entity to meet critical foreign policy objectives or satisfy treaty or contractual obligations. An example of this would be supporting U.S. military base construction or IT infrastructure.

  • Travel by applicants seeking to resume ongoing employment in the United States in the same position with the same employer and visa classification.  Forcing employers to replace employees in this situation may cause undue financial hardship.

  • Travel as a technical expert or specialist meeting a critical infrastructure need.  The consular officer may determine that an L-1B applicant falls into this category if all three of the following indicators are present:

1.      The applicant’s proposed job duties and specialized knowledge indicate the individual will provide significant and unique contributions to the petitioning company;

2.      The applicant’s specialized knowledge is specifically related to a critical infrastructure need; AND

3.      The applicant has spent multiple years with the company overseas, indicating a substantial knowledge and expertise within the organization that can only be replicated by a new employee within the company following extensive training that would cause the employer financial hardship.

H-4, L-2, and J-2 applicants

  • National interest exceptions are available for those who will accompany or follow to join a principal applicant who is a spouse or parent and who has been granted a national interest exception to P.P. 10052. Note, a national interest exception is not required if the principal applicant is not subject to P.P. 10052 (e.g. if the principal was in the United States on the effective date, June 24, or has a valid visa that the principal will use to seek entry to the United States).  In the case of a principal visa applicant who is not subject to P.P. 10052, the derivative will not be subject to the proclamation either.
     

Exceptions under P.P. 10014 for certain travel in the national interest by immigrants may include the following:

  • Applicants who are subject to aging out of their current immigrant visa classification before P.P. 10014 expires or within two weeks thereafter.

Travelers who believe their travel falls into one of these categories or is otherwise in the national interest may request a visa application appointment at the closest Embassy or Consulate and a decision will be made at the time of interview as to whether the traveler has established that they are eligible for a visa pursuant to an exception. Travelers are encouraged to refer to the Embassy/Consulate website for detailed instructions on what services are currently available and how to request an appointment.

 

Applicants for immigrant visas covered by Presidential Proclamation 10014, as extended by P.P. 10052, including Diversity Visa 2020 (DV-2020) applicants, who have not been issued an immigrant visa as of April 23, are subject to the proclamation's restrictions unless they can establish that they are eligible for an exception.  No valid visas will be revoked under this proclamation.

Department of State (DOS) Expands Interview Waiver Eligibility

The Department of State (DOS) announced that it has temporarily expanded the ability of consular officers to waive the in-person interview requirement for individuals applying for a nonimmigrant visa in the same classification. Previously, only those applicants whose nonimmigrant visa expired within 12 months were eligible for an interview waiver DOS has temporarily extended the expiration period to 24 months.  This policy is in effect until December 31, 2020. 

This change will allow consular officers to continue processing certain nonimmigrant visa applications while limiting the number of applicants who must appear at a consular section, thereby reducing the risk of COVID-19 transmission to other applicants and consular staff.  Travelers are encouraged to review the website of the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate for detailed information on what services are currently available as well as eligibility information and instructions on applying for a visa without an interview. 

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) says Appointments to Acting DHS Leadership Roles Were Invalid

On August 14, 2020, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported  the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not follow the proper succession rules in making Chad Wolf the Acting Secretary of DHS and in making Kenneth Cuccinelli the senior official performing the duties of Deputy Secretary, and they were thus ineligible for their positions. The GAO report came at the request of the heads of two House committees.

Following this report on August 17, Chad Mizelle, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the General Counsel at DHS, sent a letter to the GAO arguing that Chad Wolf and Kenneth Cuccinelli are lawfully performing their current roles at DHS and asking GAO to immediately rescind its report claiming otherwise.

The GAO has since responded on August 21, denying DHS’ request that they rescind their decision on the legality of service of both Chad Wolf and Kenneth Cuccinelli.  As such, these invalid appointments are now being used to challenge USCIS policies in current lawsuits.

USCIS fee increases expected in October met with lawsuits

On August 3, 2020, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Final Rule that significantly alters the USCIS fee schedule by adjusting fees, adding new fees, establishing multiple fees for nonimmigrant worker petitions, and limiting the number of beneficiaries for certain forms.  These new fees are set to take effect on October 2, 2020.

Since then, two lawsuits were filed challenging the fee hikes and related actions. On August 20, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and eight other organizations sued USCIS over the agency’s fee rule, which raises application fees for many essential immigration benefits by 30 to 200 percent, and eliminates most fee waivers for qualifying low income immigrants

On August 21, additional advocacy groups including Public Citizen, on behalf of immigrant advocacy groups Ayuda, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and CASA de Maryland, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that USCIS’s new fee rule will unlawfully force immigrants seeking naturalization, asylum, employment authorization, and humanitarian protections to pay high fees. The plaintiffs request that the court set aside the new fee rule on the ground that Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf, who approved it, is ineligible to serve in that position (see next news update below). Plaintiffs also contend that the rule is based on incomplete and unsupported justifications, violates several provisions of the INA, and failed to comply with the rulemaking requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The lawsuit amends an existing lawsuit challenging DHS’s October 2019 revisions to the standards applicable to individuals seeking fee waivers. (Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, et al. v. USCIS, et al., 8/21/20)

Iandoli Desai & Cronin PC will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates when available.

 

USCIS furloughs cancelled, delays still expected

USCIS announced on August 25, 2020 that the agency will avert a furlough of nearly 70% of its workforce, which was initially scheduled for August 3, then postponed to August 31.    The first delay announcement on July 24 came after Senate Appropriations Committee Vice Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) pressed USCIS to reverse course on its intended furlough after he made public the fact that new revenue estimates showed the agency due to end the fiscal year in a surplus, and not the previously projected $571 million deficit. 

USCIS now expects to be able to maintain operations through the end of fiscal year 2020, September 30, 2020, noting however that aggressive spending reduction measures will impact all agency operations. USCIS reports that the additional cost savings come through the descoping of federal contracts that assist USCIS adjudicators in processing and preparing case files as well as a myriad of other support activities. Anticipated operational impacts include increased wait times for pending case inquiries with the USCIS Contact Center, longer case processing times, and increased adjudication time for aliens adjusting status or naturalizing. 

USCIS Will NOT Accept New DACA Applications

Despite the Supreme Court’s decision blocking the rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, the administration plans to continue its existing policy of not accepting new DACA applicants.  On July 28, 2020, DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf issued a memo, “Reconsideration of the June 15, 2012 Memorandum Entitled ‘Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children,’” noting that in response to the Supreme Court’s decision, he is rescinding the 2017 and 2018 memoranda that rescinded DACA. Pending the Acting Secretary’s full reconsideration of the DACA policy, per the memo, DHS will:

  • reject all pending and future initial requests for DACA;

  • reject all pending and future applications for advance parole absent exceptional circumstances;

  • and shorten the period of renewed deferred action granted pursuant to the DACA policy after the issuance of the memorandum to one year.

Iandoli Desai & Cronin P.C. will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates.

DOL’s OFLC Verifies Regulations that Control PERM Notice of Filing Requirement

During the July 23, 2020, Department of Labor’s (DOL) Open Forum during AILA’s virtual annual conference, the DOL’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) confirmed that the PERM Notice of Filing (NOF) requirement found at 20 CFR 656.10(d)(1)(ii) is flexible and employers can satisfy this regulatory requirement by posting notice for 10 consecutive business days at the worksite.

While there are currently countless different work-from-home and office-closure scenarios, OFLC confirmed that employers could even satisfy the NOF requirement for PERM by posting the NOF on the exterior door of its building, office, or front entry even if the work place is 100% closed and employees are 100% remote, so long as the business is operational (i.e., conducting business). AILA’s DOL Liaison Committee further inquired whether OFLC anticipates in the future issuing audits to question the level of operability of the business or level of occupancy of the building, and OFLC indicated that it does not customarily make this inquiry and does not anticipate doing so in the future. Finally, OFLC will not be issuing a FAQ on this issue as it feels the regulations are flexible and provide for compliant posting even during the COVID-19 pandemic.